WRESTLEFILE EVENT FILE

ECW December to Dismember 2006: WWE Built a Disaster Around One Good Match

The factual record, historical context, match-by-match analysis, and WrestleFile verdict.

WWE/ECWDecember 3, 2006James Brown Arena
THE WRESTLEGRADEF2.3 / 10FINAL EVENT SCOREMASTER FILE RANK#1030OF 1030
PROMOTION
WWE ECW
DATE
December 3, 2006
VENUE
James Brown Arena
LOCATION
Augusta, Georgia
ATTENDANCE
4,800
EVENT TYPE
PPV
THE FILE

ECW December to Dismember 2006 has one genuinely good wrestling match, one famous historical collapse, and almost nothing in between. The Hardys and MNM open with a long, energetic tag match that would fit comfortably on a much better card. After that, the event turns into a sequence of underdeveloped television programs, weak stipulations, and wrestlers who either lack heat or are placed in roles beyond what the audience will accept. The Extreme Elimination Chamber should rescue the night through spectacle, but eliminating CM Punk and Rob Van Dam early leaves the crowd rejecting the intended Bobby Lashley coronation. The show does not merely feel bad; it feels unfinished.

Read the Full FileContinue the event-level analysis

That is why December to Dismember lands at F, 2.2 out of 10. The final WrestleGrade lands there because the opening tag match carries substantial weight, but the complete-event experience deserves a significant penalty for the empty undercard, early finish, hostile crowd reaction, and disastrous main-event sequencing. Only two matches had been promoted in advance, and the final broadcast ended unusually early for a pay-per-view of the period. The event’s reputation as one of WWE’s worst major shows is not nostalgia exaggeration. It is a night where the structural failures are more memorable than almost any wrestling that happens after the opener.

Event ContextBackground, stakes & historical setting

ECW December to Dismember 2006 took place on December 3, 2006, at James Brown Arena in Augusta, Georgia, before a reported crowd of 4,800. It was WWE’s only pay-per-view built specifically around the relaunched ECW television brand, although wrestlers from Raw and SmackDown also appeared. Six matches aired on the pay-per-view, while Stevie Richards defeated René Duprée in a non-televised bout before the broadcast. The Hardys against MNM and the Extreme Elimination Chamber were the only two matches promoted before the show began. The main event featured ECW Champion Big Show defending against Bobby Lashley, Rob Van Dam, Test, CM Punk, and Hardcore Holly, who replaced Sabu after an injury angle earlier in the night.

The event arrived only one week after Survivor Series and two weeks before Armageddon, leaving WWE with three pay-per-views in a four-week stretch. The ECW brand had launched on television in June 2006 after the popularity of the earlier One Night Stand events, but its weekly identity had already moved away from the original promotion’s presentation. December to Dismember exposed that tension badly. The crowd chanted against the product during the undercard and reacted angrily when Sabu was removed from the Chamber. CM Punk and Rob Van Dam were among the most popular wrestlers in the building, yet both were eliminated before Lashley’s final run. The show drew about 90,000 buys, a historically weak number for WWE at the time.

VIEWING GUIDE

Watch, Skim or Skip?

WATCH
  • The Hardys vs. MNM
SKIM
  • Bobby Lashley vs. Big Show vs. Test vs. Rob Van Dam vs. Hardcore Holly vs. CM Punk — Extreme Elimination Chamber
SKIP
  • Balls Mahoney vs. Matt Striker — Striker's Rules Match
  • Elijah Burke & Sylvester Terkay vs. The F.B.I.
  • Daivari vs. Tommy Dreamer
  • Kevin Thorn & Ariel vs. Mike Knox & Kelly Kelly
MATCH-BY-MATCH ANALYSIS

The Card, On the Record

01The Hardys def. MNMB-

The Hardys and MNM produce the only match on December to Dismember that consistently resembles pay-per-view quality. Twenty-two minutes gives both teams room to isolate opponents, build hot tags, and layer familiar tandem offense into a coherent escalation. Matt Hardy’s extended punishment gives the middle of the match structure, while Jeff Hardy’s entrance raises the pace and finally gives the Augusta crowd something to invest in. MNM are smooth enough as antagonists to keep the long runtime from collapsing, and the finishing sequence lands cleanly with Jeff’s Swanton Bomb. The match is longer than necessary, but it is energetic, professional, and comfortably the best thing on the show.

VERDICT

The card’s lone strong match and the only bout that feels worthy of the pay-per-view setting.

02Balls Mahoney def. Matt Striker — Striker's Rules MatchF

Balls Mahoney and Matt Striker are saddled with a comedy stipulation that removes much of the personality the ECW label is supposed to represent. The rules ban eye gouging, hair pulling, top-rope moves, and foul language, which creates an intentionally sanitized framework but not an entertaining one. Striker controls long stretches with basic holds while Mahoney’s comeback arrives without much buildup or urgency. The audience offers little reaction, and the match never establishes a compelling reason to care about who wins. Mahoney’s spinebuster ends the bout abruptly after seven minutes, leaving a segment that feels more like filler for television than something people should have paid to see.

VERDICT

A weak comedy concept attached to flat wrestling and almost no meaningful payoff.

03Elijah Burke & Sylvester Terkay def. The F.B.I.F

Elijah Burke and Sylvester Terkay beating the F.B.I. functions as a showcase for the newer heel team, but the presentation exposes how thin the card is. Little Guido and Tony Mamaluke bump willingly and provide brief bursts of movement, while Burke supplies the cleaner offense and Terkay is protected through limited involvement. The match never develops a serious competitive rhythm, and the crowd becomes openly restless instead of investing in the newcomers. Burke’s finishing sequence is decisive, followed by Terkay adding a post-match Muscle Buster to reinforce the act. As developmental television material it might have served a purpose, but on a pay-per-view it feels badly undercooked and dramatically out of place.

VERDICT

A basic showcase match that exposes the lack of depth rather than creating momentum for the winners.

04Daivari def. Tommy DreamerF

Daivari and Tommy Dreamer work a slow, low-energy match that never finds the intensity normally associated with Dreamer or the ECW name. The Great Khali’s early presence creates the only obvious threat, but once he is ejected the match settles into extended stalling and basic offense. Dreamer’s comeback produces a few familiar spots, yet the audience remains detached and the finish arrives through a tights-assisted roll-up. Khali returning afterward to attack Dreamer provides a more memorable visual than anything during the bell-to-bell portion. The match does advance a simple heel program, but seven minutes of minimal action followed by an interference-heavy aftermath is not enough for a major-event slot.

VERDICT

A lifeless television-level match whose post-match attack matters more than the wrestling.

05Kevin Thorn & Ariel def. Mike Knox & Kelly KellyF

Kevin Thorn, Ariel, Mike Knox, and Kelly Kelly produce the weakest match on the card and one of the clearest examples of a performer being used before she was ready. The wrestling is hesitant, the exchanges are awkward, and Kelly’s limited experience makes even basic transitions look uncertain. The storyline goal is Knox abandoning his partner, but the match takes too long to reach that obvious beat and offers no compelling action along the way. Ariel pins Kelly after Knox walks out, then Thorn and Ariel continue the attack until The Sandman makes the save. The angle is understandable, yet the execution is so rough that the segment damages the show more than it advances anyone involved.

VERDICT

A badly executed storyline match that belongs near the bottom of WWE’s pay-per-view catalog.

06Bobby Lashley won the Extreme Elimination ChamberD-

The Extreme Elimination Chamber has an inherently strong visual and enough weapons to promise chaos, but the booking drains the crowd before Bobby Lashley ever enters. CM Punk is eliminated first despite receiving one of the night’s strongest reactions, and Rob Van Dam follows shortly afterward, removing the two wrestlers the audience most wants to see. Test gets a brief power run before Lashley escapes his sabotaged pod and clears the remaining obstacles. Big Show enters last with the barbed-wire bat, but the final sequence is short and the champion never feels like a serious threat. Lashley’s title win is decisive, yet the Chamber feels more like a forced coronation than a dramatic survival match.

VERDICT

A potentially great stipulation crippled by elimination order, crowd rejection, and a rushed coronation.

BOOKING VERDICTF

The booking earns an F because the entire card is structured around choices the audience either does not care about or actively rejects. Only two matches were announced beforehand, which means most of the undercard arrives without meaningful pay-per-view anticipation. Balls Mahoney versus Matt Striker uses a deliberately restrictive gimmick that fights the ECW identity, Burke and Terkay against the F.B.I. feels like a developmental showcase, and Daivari against Dreamer exists mostly to set up a post-match Khali attack. The mixed tag is even worse, asking an inexperienced Kelly Kelly to carry significant in-ring responsibility before using Mike Knox’s abandonment as the actual storyline payoff.

The main event compounds every earlier mistake. Sabu is removed and replaced by Hardcore Holly, angering the crowd before the Chamber begins. CM Punk is eliminated first despite strong support, followed by Rob Van Dam, leaving the audience with fewer reasons to invest in the remaining field. Bobby Lashley then overcomes a sabotaged pod, Test, and Big Show in a sequence designed to establish him as ECW’s new centerpiece. The championship change is clear, but the crowd has already rejected the path. Instead of using the Chamber to validate Lashley, the booking makes his coronation feel imposed and turns the stipulation into evidence of the larger creative disconnect.

CROWD & PRESENTATIONF

Crowd and Presentation also earns an F because the audience becomes a running commentary on how badly the show is failing. Augusta never feels like a natural home for an ECW-branded pay-per-view, and the building lacks the emotional connection that Philadelphia or another traditional ECW market might have created. The Hardys and MNM receive reasonable engagement, but later matches generate apathy, hostile chants, and visible frustration. The Sabu replacement angle draws an especially negative reaction, while Punk’s elimination deflates the Chamber at the exact point the match should be building. By the final stretch, the crowd is reacting to the booking more than participating in the story WWE wants to tell.

The broadcast itself reinforces the sense of incompleteness. The card is short, the undercard lacks major-event scale, and the show signs off well before the traditional end time for WWE pay-per-views of that era. The Extreme Elimination Chamber provides the only large production element, but weapons and pods cannot compensate for poor sequencing. Even the ECW label creates an expectation the event rarely satisfies because most matches are conventional and sanitized. The show looks like a pay-per-view in isolated moments, yet it feels like an underfilled television special for most of its runtime. Presentation cannot hide the absence of depth.

HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCEA-

December to Dismember earns an A-minus for Historical Significance precisely because the failure had consequences far beyond one bad night. The event drew roughly 90,000 buys, one of the weakest pay-per-view totals in WWE history before the streaming era, and quickly became shorthand for the problems surrounding the 2006 ECW relaunch. Less than a day later, Paul Heyman was removed from the brand’s creative leadership and sent home after disagreements over the direction of the show. The event would be WWE’s only ECW-branded pay-per-view and its only televised use of the December to Dismember name. That alone gives the card an unusually clear place in company history.

The main event also contains several meaningful career markers. Bobby Lashley wins his first ECW World Championship and is positioned as the brand’s new lead star. CM Punk’s elimination and the crowd’s reaction later became part of the mythology around WWE initially resisting his ascent, particularly because Heyman favored him more strongly. Big Show soon stepped away from wrestling, while the ECW brand continued for several more years without another exclusive pay-per-view. The show’s enduring importance is therefore not based on classic wrestling but on what its failure exposed: a mismatch between the ECW audience, WWE’s creative direction, and the product the company was trying to sell.

WHAT AGED WELL
  • The Hardys versus MNM remains a genuinely good tag match and comfortably the best wrestling on the show.
  • The crowd’s support for CM Punk and Rob Van Dam accurately reflects which wrestlers connected most strongly with the audience.
  • Bobby Lashley’s championship victory is an important early milestone in a career that later returned to WWE at a much higher level.
  • The show is historically valuable as a case study in how branding and audience expectations can collide with creative direction.
  • Its short runtime makes the event easier to revisit than many other poorly received WWE pay-per-views.
WHAT AGED POORLY
  • Only two matches were announced before the event, leaving most of the card without meaningful buildup.
  • The undercard is filled with television-level matches that do not justify a separate pay-per-view purchase.
  • Kelly Kelly is visibly not ready for the responsibility given to her in the mixed tag match.
  • Removing Sabu and then eliminating CM Punk and Rob Van Dam early creates an openly hostile audience reaction.
  • The ECW branding promises a style and atmosphere that most of the card does not remotely deliver.
RESEARCH VERDICTWhere the Evidence Lands

The review record is remarkably consistent about the scale of the failure. TJR’s retrospective and later review both score December to Dismember 2 out of 10, describing the Hardy-MNM opener as the only real highlight and the Chamber as a badly booked disappointment. The CAGEMATCH event average is 1.49 from more than two hundred votes, placing the show near the floor of modern WWE event reception. Contemporary and retrospective reviews repeatedly identify the same structural problems: an underbuilt card, weak undercard matches, the replacement of Sabu, hostile crowd reactions, and an elimination order that removes Punk and Van Dam before the intended Lashley coronation.

The match scores therefore tell only part of the story. The Hardys and MNM raise the match distribution substantially, and the Chamber has enough spectacle to avoid the very bottom of the scale. Everything else sits deep in failing territory. The overall verdict is dragged lower by how badly the show functions as a packaged pay-per-view: only two matches were advertised, the crowd repeatedly rejects the creative choices, the ECW identity is poorly represented, and the broadcast ends unusually early. An overall 2.2 captures both the one good match and the broader historical disaster.

RESEARCH SOURCESSources & Methodology
20 sources

These sources support the event record, historical context, critical reception, and streaming information used throughout this Event File.

  1. TJR WrestlingRetrospective full-event review with a 2/10 final score
  2. TJR WrestlingLater full-event review with a 2/10 final score
  3. 411Mania2006 year-end match-level context for the event
  4. 411ManiaContemporary complete-event review and criticism
  5. Bleacher ReportTen-year retrospective on the event's historically poor reception
  6. WhatCulturePlacement among WWE's 2006 pay-per-views
  7. WhatCulturePlacement among historically weak wrestling pay-per-views
  8. WhatCultureRetrospective criticism of the Thorn and Ariel mixed tag match
  9. Inside PulseContemporary full-event review
  10. KB Wrestling ReviewsRetrospective full-card review and match commentary
  11. Slam WrestlingContemporary 4.5/10 event review
  12. Pro Wrestling Dot NetContemporary review of the event and Extreme Elimination Chamber
  13. CAGEMATCHEvent user-rating page for ECW December to Dismember 2006
  14. CAGEMATCHMatch-rating page for the Extreme Elimination Chamber
  15. ProFightDBEvent results and match-star reference for ECW December to Dismember 2006
  16. IMDbUser-review page for ECW December to Dismember 2006
  17. IMDbIndividual retrospective user review of the event
  18. AmazonHome-video customer review perspective
  19. WWEOfficial event identity, results, and storyline summaries
  20. PressplayHistorical event listing and viewing-reference page
WHERE TO WATCH

Stream This Event

Checked August 24, 2026STATUS
No confirmed full-event stream

Netflix has a public title page identifying ECW December to Dismember as a 2006 program, but that page alone does not establish a current complete United States replay. No current full-event provider is claimed.

WrestleFile lists only streaming options we have specifically confirmed. Availability varies by country and can change.