WRESTLEFILE EVENT FILE

No Surrender 2006: Ultimate X and Samoa Joe Give TNA a Powerful Closing Stretch

The factual record, historical context, match-by-match analysis, and WrestleFile verdict.

TNASeptember 24, 2006TNA Impact! Zone
THE WRESTLEGRADEA-8.6 / 10FINAL EVENT SCOREMASTER FILE RANK#192OF 1030
PROMOTION
TNA Wrestling
DATE
September 24, 2006
VENUE
TNA Impact! Zone
LOCATION
Orlando, Florida
ATTENDANCE
900
EVENT TYPE
PPV
THE FILE

No Surrender 2006 is another TNA card whose grade is earned by the second half, but this time the peak is strong enough to reach A- territory. Senshi and Chris Sabin receive nearly seventeen minutes for the X Division Championship, Christian Cage and Rhino work a substantial singles match, Styles and Daniels regain the tag titles from LAX in Ultimate X, and Samoa Joe closes by defeating Jeff Jarrett in a Fan's Revenge Lumberjack match. The opening bouts are modest and the battle royal is more functional than essential, yet the final four matches give the show sustained quality, clear consequences and stylistic variety.

Event ContextBackground, stakes & historical setting

No Surrender 2006 took place at the TNA Impact! Zone in Orlando with an attendance of 900. The nine-match card has no pre-show. Bobby Roode defeats Vaughn Doring in 4:28, Eric Young defeats A-1 in 6:14, and Jay Lethal beats Petey Williams in 7:24. Abyss then defeats Raven and Brother Runt in an 11:34 No Disqualification match. The Naturals win a 14:05 Triple Chance battle royal to become number-one contenders to the NWA World Tag Team Championship, setting up the final four-match stretch. Senshi retains the TNA X Division Championship against Chris Sabin in 16:57. Christian Cage defeats Rhino in 16:26. A.J. Styles and Christopher Daniels defeat LAX in a 15:29 Ultimate X match to win the NWA World Tag Team Championship.

Samoa Joe then defeats Jeff Jarrett in an 11:03 Fan's Revenge Lumberjack match. The event finishes with four consecutive matches that all have either championship stakes, major-star importance or a distinctive stipulation. That concentration gives the closing hour a substantially stronger pay-per-view feel than the short opening singles matches. The card develops a stronger identity once the major divisional and rivalry matches begin to stack together. Earlier material serves mostly as support, while the later matches receive the time and stakes needed to feel like genuine pay-per-view attractions. That structure gives the show a useful sense of escalation and makes the closing portion feel like the destination of the event rather than simply its final matches.

VIEWING GUIDE

Watch, Skim or Skip?

WATCH
  • Senshi (c) defeated Chris Sabin
  • Christian Cage defeated Rhino
  • A.J. Styles and Christopher Daniels defeated The Latin American Exchange (Hernandez and Homicide) (c) (with Konnan)
  • Samoa Joe defeated Jeff Jarrett
SKIM
  • Jay Lethal defeated Petey Williams
  • Abyss (with James Mitchell) defeated Raven and Brother Runt
  • The Naturals (Andy Douglas and Chase Stevens) (with Shane Douglas) defeated seven other teams*
SKIP
  • Bobby Roode defeated Vaughn Doring
  • Eric Young defeated A-1
MATCH-BY-MATCH ANALYSIS

The Card, On the Record

01Bobby Roode defeated Vaughn DoringC-

Bobby Roode defeated Vaughn Doring. The match is presented as singles match and runs 4:28. On the main card, its value comes from the result, placement and the amount of time the card gives the idea. The match is acceptable but slight, with too little time or consequence to create much lasting value beyond filling its position on the card. The 5.8 score reflects the complete bell-to-bell proposition rather than later reputation: immediate match quality, role on No Surrender 2006, and how much the result adds to the surrounding card are weighed together.

VERDICT

Skimmable material with limited replay value.

02Eric Young defeated A-1C

Eric Young defeated A-1. The match is presented as singles match and runs 6:14. On the main card, its value comes from the result, placement and the amount of time the card gives the idea. The match does its job without damaging the event, though its limited stakes or modest presentation make it an easy omission from a selective rewatch. The 6.2 score reflects the complete bell-to-bell proposition rather than later reputation: immediate match quality, role on No Surrender 2006, and how much the result adds to the surrounding card are weighed together.

VERDICT

Serviceable but nonessential. within the context of this event.

03Jay Lethal defeated Petey WilliamsB-

Jay Lethal defeated Petey Williams. The match is presented as singles match and runs 7:24. On the main card, its value comes from the result, placement and the amount of time the card gives the idea. The match is solid and purposeful, providing a clear role in the card without reaching the urgency or consequence of the strongest bouts around it. The 7.0 score reflects the complete bell-to-bell proposition rather than later reputation: immediate match quality, role on No Surrender 2006, and how much the result adds to the surrounding card are weighed together.

VERDICT

A worthwhile supporting match with a clear purpose.

04Abyss (with James Mitchell) defeated Raven and Brother RuntB

Abyss (with James Mitchell) defeated Raven and Brother Runt. The match is presented as no disqualification match and runs 11:34. On the main card, its value comes from the result, placement and the amount of time the card gives the idea. The match is consistently good and earns its place on the card, even if it lacks the singular peak needed to join the event's top tier. The 7.8 score reflects the complete bell-to-bell proposition rather than later reputation: immediate match quality, role on No Surrender 2006, and how much the result adds to the surrounding card are weighed together.

VERDICT

A good match that rewards a full-card watch.

05The Naturals (Andy Douglas and Chase Stevens) (with Shane Douglas) defeated seven other teams*B

The Naturals (Andy Douglas and Chase Stevens) (with Shane Douglas) defeated seven other teams*. The match is presented as triple chance battle royal to determine #1 contenders to the nwa world tag team championship and runs 14:05. On the main card, its value comes from the result, placement and the amount of time the card gives the idea. The match is consistently good and earns its place on the card, even if it lacks the singular peak needed to join the event's top tier. The 7.6 score reflects the complete bell-to-bell proposition rather than later reputation: immediate match quality, role on No Surrender 2006, and how much the result adds to the surrounding card are weighed together.

VERDICT

A good match that rewards a full-card watch.

06Senshi (c) defeated Chris SabinB+

Senshi (c) defeated Chris Sabin. The match is presented as singles match for the tna x division championship and runs 16:57. On the main card, its value comes from the result, placement and the amount of time the card gives the idea. Nearly seventeen minutes gives Senshi and Sabin enough room to make the X Division title defense feel like a genuine upper-card feature. The match is a strong feature that materially improves the event, combining solid execution with stakes or placement that justify its prominence. The 8.4 score reflects the complete bell-to-bell proposition rather than later reputation: immediate match quality, role on No Surrender 2006, and how much the result adds to the surrounding card are weighed together.

VERDICT

A strong match that is comfortably worth watching.

07Christian Cage defeated RhinoA-

Christian Cage defeated Rhino. The match is presented as singles match and runs 16:26. On the main card, its value comes from the result, placement and the amount of time the card gives the idea. Cage and Rhino receive more than sixteen minutes without a championship attached, a sign that the upper card can support substantial non-title singles programs. The match is excellent, with enough consequence and sustained quality to stand among the event's defining attractions rather than merely support them. The 8.5 score reflects the complete bell-to-bell proposition rather than later reputation: immediate match quality, role on No Surrender 2006, and how much the result adds to the surrounding card are weighed together.

VERDICT

An excellent match and one of the event's strongest attractions.

08A.J. Styles and Christopher Daniels defeated The Latin American Exchange (Hernandez and Homicide) (c) (with Konnan)A

A.J. Styles and Christopher Daniels defeated The Latin American Exchange (Hernandez and Homicide) (c) (with Konnan). The match is presented as ultimate x match for the nwa world tag team championship and runs 15:29. On the main card, its value comes from the result, placement and the amount of time the card gives the idea. Ultimate X gives the tag-title change an unmistakable TNA identity and lets Styles and Daniels regain the belts in a match that feels larger than a standard rematch. The match reaches elite territory because the stakes, structure and result reinforce one another, making it an obvious priority on any selective rewatch. The 9.0 score reflects the complete bell-to-bell proposition rather than later reputation: immediate match quality, role on No Surrender 2006, and how much the result adds to the surrounding card are weighed together.

VERDICT

A major match that belongs on any focused rewatch of the event.

09Samoa Joe defeated Jeff JarrettA-

Samoa Joe defeated Jeff Jarrett. The match is presented as fan's revenge lumberjack match and runs 11:03. On the main card, its value comes from the result, placement and the amount of time the card gives the idea. Joe's victory over Jarrett closes the event with a decisive marquee result and continues Joe's rise against established top-card opponents. The match is excellent, with enough consequence and sustained quality to stand among the event's defining attractions rather than merely support them. The 8.7 score reflects the complete bell-to-bell proposition rather than later reputation: immediate match quality, role on No Surrender 2006, and how much the result adds to the surrounding card are weighed together.

VERDICT

An excellent match and one of the event's strongest attractions.

BOOKING VERDICTA-

The booking is strong because the late results create movement without making every championship change hands. Senshi retains over Sabin, preserving the X Division champion after a long defense. Styles and Daniels regain the tag titles from LAX in Ultimate X, giving the rivalry a major stipulation payoff. Samoa Joe beating Jeff Jarrett in the main event gives Joe another important win against an established top-card opponent. The Naturals also leave with contender status. The early singles matches are less significant, but the final half provides enough clear advancement that the show exits with several programs materially changed. The final stretch consequently feels planned as a progression rather than a collection of unrelated attractions, which strengthens the event-level verdict.

CROWD & PRESENTATIONA-

The 900-person Impact! Zone setting remains familiar, but No Surrender uses match structure effectively to create escalation. The early singles bouts are short and straightforward, while the card gradually moves into No Disqualification, a battle royal, a long X Division title match, a sixteen-minute Cage-Rhino bout, Ultimate X and a lumberjack main event. The accumulation of formats prevents the second half from feeling repetitive. Ultimate X is especially important to the presentation because it gives the tag-title change a visual identity distinct from a conventional championship match. The main event then shifts back toward star power and crowd involvement, creating a different closing tone.

HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCEA-

No Surrender 2006 is historically useful because it places several of TNA's central 2006 names in consequential positions on the same card. Senshi remains X Division champion after a long defense against Chris Sabin, while A.J. Styles and Christopher Daniels reclaim the NWA World Tag Team Championship from LAX in one of TNA's signature stipulations. Samoa Joe's victory over Jeff Jarrett further strengthens Joe's position against the promotion's established main-event hierarchy. Christian Cage versus Rhino also occupies substantial time without needing a championship, reflecting how deep the upper card had become. The event does not hinge on a world-title change, but its closing sequence meaningfully rearranges the tag division and reinforces Joe's trajectory. That makes it an important connective show heading deeper into the fall of 2006.

WHAT AGED WELL
  • The final four matches create a sustained run of meaningful upper-card action.
  • Ultimate X gives the tag-title change a signature TNA identity.
  • Joe's win over Jarrett provides the main event with a decisive top-card result.
WHAT AGED POORLY
  • The first three singles matches are too slight to add much pay-per-view value.
  • The battle royal is useful for contender setup but less compelling as a standalone attraction.
  • The show takes several matches to reach its strongest rhythm.
RESEARCH VERDICTWhere the Evidence Lands

The locked card supports an A- grade because the final four matches are all substantial and all serve different purposes. Senshi-Sabin provides a long X Division title defense, Cage-Rhino is a major singles match, Ultimate X produces a tag-title change, and Joe-Jarrett gives the main event a decisive marquee result. The first half is considerably weaker, with three short singles bouts and a battle royal that is more setup than destination. Even with that imbalance, the upper card is deep enough that the event feels complete rather than dependent on one isolated match. A selective rewatch can start midway through, but the final hour is excellent.

RESEARCH SOURCESSources & Methodology
5 sources

These sources support the event record, historical context, critical reception, and streaming information used throughout this Event File.

  1. WikipediaEvent identity, card results, match context, and historical corroboration.
  2. Pro Wrestling HistoryCard results, match durations, stipulations, title context, and historical corroboration.
  3. 411ManiaContemporary event reporting, match context, results, and historical corroboration.
  4. Internet ArchiveArchived event context, promotion context, and historical corroboration.
  5. TheSmackDownHotelCard results, match durations, stipulations, title context, and historical corroboration.
WHERE TO WATCH

Stream This Event

Checked September 18, 2026STATUS
No confirmed full-event stream

Locked factual research established no current provider that can be asserted safely here; no territory-safe direct viewing destination is included.

WrestleFile lists only streaming options we have specifically confirmed. Availability varies by country and can change.