WRESTLEFILE EVENT FILE

Money in the Bank 2017: Great Wrestling, Awful Timing, and One Historic Mistake

The factual record, historical context, match-by-match analysis, and WrestleFile verdict.

WWEJune 18, 2017Scottrade Center
THE WRESTLEGRADEB-7.1 / 10FINAL EVENT SCOREMASTER FILE RANK#673OF 1015
PROMOTION
World Wrestling Entertainment
DATE
June 18, 2017
VENUE
Scottrade Center
LOCATION
St. Louis, Missouri
ATTENDANCE
15,392
EVENT TYPE
PPV
THE FILE

Money in the Bank 2017 is a good wrestling show repeatedly interrupted by booking decisions that refuse to let the good wrestling stand on its own. The men’s ladder match is excellent, The Usos and The New Day are already operating with elite tag-team chemistry, and the first women’s ladder match is competitive before its finish hijacks the entire conversation. Jinder Mahal and Randy Orton also benefit from an invested St. Louis crowd, while the Kickoff match is perfectly functional. The problem is a pattern: James Ellsworth retrieves Carmella’s briefcase, the Usos walk out for a countout, and Mahal again wins through the chaos created by The Singh Brothers.

Read the Full FileContinue the event-level analysis

That tension puts the event at B-, 7.1 out of 10. The final WrestleGrade lands there because Naomi against Lana and the Breezango filler pull down a card whose top end is much stronger. The complete show gains value from atmosphere, historical importance, and an outstanding main event, but it cannot escape the feeling that WWE kept choosing controversy over satisfying conclusions. Money in the Bank should be about a single decisive act of climbing higher than everyone else. In 2017, the men deliver that idea beautifully while too much of the rest of the show finds ways to make the finish more memorable than the match.

Event ContextBackground, stakes & historical setting

Money in the Bank 2017 took place on June 18, 2017, at Scottrade Center in St. Louis, Missouri, before a reported crowd of 15,392. It was a SmackDown-exclusive event during WWE’s second brand split and the eighth pay-per-view held under the Money in the Bank name. Seven matches were broadcast, including The Hype Bros against The Colóns on the Kickoff show and an impromptu Breezango match against The Ascension. The event featured the first women’s Money in the Bank ladder match, with Carmella, Becky Lynch, Charlotte Flair, Natalya, and Tamina competing for a future women’s championship opportunity. The men’s ladder match included Baron Corbin, AJ Styles, Dolph Ziggler, Kevin Owens, Sami Zayn, and Shinsuke Nakamura.

The WWE Championship program also carried unusual local significance because Randy Orton challenged Jinder Mahal in Orton’s hometown, with his father and several wrestling legends seated at ringside. Mahal had won the title from Orton at Backlash one month earlier with help from The Singh Brothers. The New Day were newly established on SmackDown and challenged The Usos for the tag titles, while Naomi defended the women’s championship against Lana in Lana’s first major singles opportunity. Maria Kanellis returned during the broadcast alongside Mike Kanellis, who made his WWE debut. The event ultimately became most important for two ladder-match outcomes: Carmella’s controversial first victory and Corbin beginning a briefcase run that ended with a failed cash-in two months later.

VIEWING GUIDE

Watch, Skim or Skip?

WATCH
  • The Usos vs. The New Day — SmackDown Tag Team Championship
  • Baron Corbin vs. AJ Styles vs. Dolph Ziggler vs. Kevin Owens vs. Sami Zayn vs. Shinsuke Nakamura — Money in the Bank Ladder Match
SKIM
  • Carmella vs. Becky Lynch vs. Charlotte Flair vs. Natalya vs. Tamina — Women's Money in the Bank Ladder Match
  • Jinder Mahal vs. Randy Orton — WWE Championship
SKIP
  • The Hype Bros vs. The Colóns — Kickoff
  • Naomi vs. Lana — SmackDown Women's Championship
  • Breezango vs. The Ascension
MATCH-BY-MATCH ANALYSIS

The Card, On the Record

01The Hype Bros def. The Colóns — KickoffC-

The Hype Bros and The Colóns give the Kickoff show a conventional tag match built around Zack Ryder’s return from knee surgery. The Colóns sensibly target the repaired leg and spend the middle portion isolating Ryder, which gives Mojo Rawley a straightforward hot-tag role. Rawley’s burst of offense wakes up the crowd, while Ryder returning for the closing stretch gives the match a small emotional hook. The Hype Ryder finishes things cleanly after eight and a half minutes. Nothing here feels especially inventive, but the structure is coherent, the comeback has a purpose, and Ryder getting the winning moment makes the match more useful than most disposable Kickoff bouts.

VERDICT

A basic but competent return match that gives Zack Ryder a sensible winning moment.

02Carmella def. Becky Lynch, Charlotte Flair, Natalya and Tamina — Women's Money in the Bank Ladder MatchB-

The first women’s Money in the Bank ladder match is better in execution than its infamous finish suggests. The five wrestlers work through a steady series of ladder setups, saves, and increasingly dangerous collisions without letting the match become completely shapeless. Becky Lynch and Charlotte Flair generate the strongest crowd reactions, while Natalya and Tamina provide enough physical resistance to keep the climbing sequences competitive. Then James Ellsworth knocks Lynch from the ladder, climbs himself, and hands the briefcase to Carmella. The heel logic is understandable, but the visual of a man retrieving the prize in the first women’s edition overwhelms thirteen minutes of good work and immediately creates controversy.

VERDICT

Good ladder-match work permanently overshadowed by a finish that sabotages its own historic premise.

03The New Day def. The Usos — SmackDown Tag Team ChampionshipB

The Usos and The New Day already show the chemistry that would define one of WWE’s strongest tag rivalries of the era. Kofi Kingston absorbs a focused isolation segment before Big E changes the tempo with explosive offense, and the final minutes stack saves, blind tags, and near falls without losing clarity. The Midnight Hour appears to give New Day the championship, only for Jimmy Uso to pull his brother out before the three-count. The champions then deliberately take the countout and leave with the titles. The wrestling is strong enough for a higher score, but a pay-per-view match this good deserves a real finish rather than an obvious device to extend the program.

VERDICT

Excellent chemistry and escalating action undercut by a deliberately unsatisfying walkout finish.

04Naomi def. Lana — SmackDown Women's ChampionshipD

Naomi versus Lana is built around uncertainty because Lana has almost no established singles résumé on WWE television at this point. She works carefully, targeting Naomi’s leg and keeping the offense simple, but several strikes and transitions look hesitant enough to expose the experience gap. Naomi provides most of the match’s pace and eventually strings together the cleaner offense. Carmella’s briefcase tease creates the loudest reaction before Naomi traps Lana in a submission and retains. The match avoids becoming a complete disaster, which is an accomplishment given the setup, yet it still feels like a developmental experiment placed in a championship slot on pay-per-view.

VERDICT

Passable for Lana’s experience level, but far below the standard expected from a championship match.

05Jinder Mahal def. Randy Orton — WWE ChampionshipC+

Jinder Mahal and Randy Orton produce a better match than their Backlash meeting largely because the St. Louis crowd is deeply invested in Orton’s homecoming. Mahal works the knee for long stretches and gives the match a clear target, while Orton sells well and gradually builds toward his familiar comeback. The loudest sequence comes when Orton attacks The Singh Brothers after they threaten his father, including an RKO through the announce table. That detour also costs him the championship when Mahal catches him returning to the ring and lands the Khallas. The work is solid and the atmosphere helps, but another interference-centered finish makes the rivalry feel repetitive rather than escalating.

VERDICT

A solid hometown title match lifted by atmosphere and dragged down by another familiar interference finish.

06Breezango def. The AscensionF

Breezango against The Ascension is an impromptu payoff to a Fashion Files mystery rather than a match with serious pay-per-view ambitions. Tyler Breeze and Fandango get the expected crowd sympathy, while Konnor and Viktor control briefly without convincing anyone that the result is in doubt. The match lasts under four minutes and never develops beyond a short heat segment followed by Fandango’s comeback. A small-package pin gives Breezango the victory and sends the storyline back to television. The segment is harmless and the characters remain entertaining, but nothing about the wrestling, stakes, or runtime justifies treating it as more than filler between the championship match and the main event.

VERDICT

Harmless Fashion Files filler that never approaches meaningful pay-per-view wrestling.

07Baron Corbin def. AJ Styles, Dolph Ziggler, Kevin Owens, Sami Zayn and Shinsuke Nakamura — Money in the Bank Ladder MatchA

The men’s Money in the Bank ladder match is the reason this event remains easy to recommend despite its booking problems elsewhere. Baron Corbin attacking Shinsuke Nakamura before the bell immediately changes the structure, allowing five wrestlers to build escalating chaos before Nakamura’s dramatic return. Sami Zayn is especially outstanding, taking dangerous bumps while repeatedly threatening to win, and AJ Styles supplies several spectacular counters around the ladders. The closing Styles-Nakamura faceoff earns a major reaction before Corbin overturns the ladder and takes the briefcase. Nearly thirty minutes fly because the match keeps introducing fresh combinations, credible winners, and memorable risks without losing the central objective.

VERDICT

An outstanding ladder match with deep suspense, memorable violence, and six believable routes to victory.

BOOKING VERDICTC-

The Booking Verdict earns a C- because Money in the Bank repeatedly creates good matches and then chooses endings that diminish them. The first women’s ladder match is the clearest example. James Ellsworth helping Carmella is perfectly consistent with their heel act, but having him personally climb the ladder and retrieve the briefcase turns a historic first into an argument about whether the winner actually won. WWE effectively acknowledges the problem by stripping Carmella of the briefcase and running the match again on SmackDown nine days later. That may extend the story, but it makes the pay-per-view result feel provisional almost immediately.

The same frustration appears elsewhere. The Usos and New Day are having a strong title match until the champions simply leave for a countout, saving the decisive result for later. Mahal and Orton work a credible twenty-minute match, only for another Singh Brothers distraction to provide the decisive opening. Corbin winning the men’s briefcase is defensible in the moment because he is positioned as a rising heel, although the later failed cash-in makes the choice age poorly. The card advances nearly every program, but too often it does so by withholding payoff rather than delivering it.

CROWD & PRESENTATIONB+

St. Louis gives Money in the Bank the kind of responsive crowd that improves almost every important match. Orton receives a major hometown reaction, the audience is engaged throughout the tag-title match, and the ladder matches benefit from immediate responses to every climb and dangerous spot. The return of Nakamura late in the main event is presented like a major moment, and his stare-down with AJ Styles creates one of the loudest reactions of the night. The presence of Bob Orton and other wrestling legends also gives the championship match a sense of occasion beyond the repetitive feud mechanics. Even controversial finishes draw strong reactions rather than silence.

Presentation earns a B+ because the event understands how to make the ladder-match concept feel central. The hanging briefcases, full entrances, and long main-event runtime give the two signature matches proper visual weight. The first women’s edition is repeatedly framed as historic, which makes the Ellsworth finish more damaging but also documents how seriously WWE wanted the milestone to register. The Fashion Files segment and impromptu match feel lighter and more television-like, while Naomi against Lana lacks the polish of the major bouts. Still, the show looks and sounds important whenever its core attractions are in the ring.

HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCEA-

Money in the Bank 2017 earns an A-minus for Historical Significance because the event permanently expands one of WWE’s most durable stipulations. This is the first women’s Money in the Bank ladder match, establishing a format that would become an annual fixture. The original finish is remembered for the wrong reason because James Ellsworth retrieves the briefcase for Carmella, prompting WWE to vacate the result and hold a second ladder match on SmackDown. Carmella wins again and eventually turns the contract into a successful championship cash-in in 2018. The controversy therefore becomes both a creative mistake and the starting point for a long-running women’s division tradition.

The men’s result also develops a distinct historical afterlife. Baron Corbin wins one of the strongest ladder matches of the era, then unsuccessfully cashes in against Jinder Mahal in August, becoming one of the rare contract holders who fails to win a championship. The show is also the only Money in the Bank event during either WWE brand-extension period to be exclusive to one brand. Maria Kanellis returns after seven years away, while Mike Kanellis debuts. None of those secondary facts matches the importance of the women’s ladder-match debut, but together they make the 2017 edition far more consequential than its B-level event status suggests.

WHAT AGED WELL
  • The men's Money in the Bank ladder match remains an excellent example of pacing a long multi-person ladder match around several credible winners.
  • The Usos and The New Day already display the chemistry that would produce even better matches later in 2017.
  • The first women's Money in the Bank match established a stipulation that became a permanent annual fixture.
  • Randy Orton's hometown reaction gives the WWE Championship match atmosphere that the broader rivalry often lacked.
  • Sami Zayn's performance in the main event stands out as one of the best individual efforts on the card.
WHAT AGED POORLY
  • James Ellsworth retrieving the briefcase makes the first women's Money in the Bank finish look even stranger with historical distance.
  • The Usos walking out for a countout wastes the strongest stretch of an otherwise very good title match.
  • Naomi versus Lana exposes how little major singles experience Lana had at the time.
  • Another Singh Brothers-assisted Jinder Mahal victory makes the title program feel repetitive.
  • Baron Corbin's strong briefcase win leads to one of the least successful contract runs in the stipulation's history.
RESEARCH VERDICTWhere the Evidence Lands

The review record explains the split personality of Money in the Bank 2017. TJR’s full review lands at 6.75 out of 10 and praises the in-ring work while criticizing several finishes, especially the women’s ladder match. The CAGEMATCH event average is 7.11, and the Pro Wrestling Dot Net poll reports a majority A grade from respondents, showing that the card’s stronger wrestling created real support despite the booking complaints. The men’s ladder match is the consensus centerpiece, with TJR later rating it four and a half stars and placing it among the best matches produced under the stipulation.

The event-level score therefore belongs above its simple match average without pretending the flaws are minor. The main event is excellent, the tag-title match is very good, the crowd is lively, and the first women’s Money in the Bank match adds permanent historical significance. At the same time, the Ellsworth finish, the tag-title countout, and another interference-driven Mahal victory create a pattern of endings that frustrate rather than satisfy. A B-, 7.1 out of 10, balances those realities: a card with high-end wrestling and durable significance that repeatedly gets in its own way.

RESEARCH SOURCESSources & Methodology
20 sources

These sources support the event record, historical context, critical reception, and streaming information used throughout this Event File.

  1. TJR WrestlingFull-event review with match ratings and a 6.75/10 final score
  2. TJR WrestlingRetrospective review of the 2017 men's and women's Money in the Bank matches
  3. Pro Wrestling Dot NetContemporary live review of the full event
  4. 411ManiaComplete-event report card with match grades
  5. Bleacher ReportResults, grades, reaction, and major highlights
  6. Bleacher ReportReview focused on the event's leading highlights and low points
  7. Bleacher ReportAssessment of the event's biggest winners and losers
  8. Bleacher ReportMatch-by-match grades and star-rating perspective
  9. WhatCultureRetrospective ranking of every match on the card
  10. WhatCultureUps-and-downs assessment of the complete event
  11. SportskeedaBest-and-worst analysis of Money in the Bank 2017
  12. SportskeedaMatch-by-match rating perspective for the complete card
  13. FanSidedEvent review, takeaways, and future projections
  14. Cageside SeatsMatch-time breakdown for the full event
  15. Cageside SeatsContemporary live results and event discussion
  16. Sporting NewsContemporary analysis of what worked and what did not
  17. CAGEMATCHEvent user-rating page for Money in the Bank 2017
  18. Pro Wrestling Dot NetPost-event poll results for best match and overall grade
  19. ProFightDBEvent results and match-star reference for Money in the Bank 2017
  20. WWEOfficial event results and storyline summaries
WHERE TO WATCH

Stream This Event

Checked August 24, 2026STATUS
No confirmed full-event stream

Netflix has a public title page associated with Money in the Bank 2017, but the page does not establish a current complete United States replay. No current full-event provider is claimed.

WrestleFile lists only streaming options we have specifically confirmed. Availability varies by country and can change.